lundin at lundin at
Mon Jan 26 18:03:42 GMT 2009

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:22:44AM +0100, Alex Broens wrote:
> On 1/26/2009 9:46 AM, Julian Field wrote:
> >Anyone using this list at all?
> >If so, any comments?
> >Does it intersect well with Spamhaus lists so is unnecessary?
> Looks pretty redundand with PBL + has a large bunch of potential FPs 
> (edus, hosters, etc)
> Personally, I wouldn't use it.

Suspect they only use it for personal mail servers. not found? And that's 30832 of someone else's
slowly aging sendmail access rules...  with lots of marked backscatter
sites, and (commented out) entry "Deity, I hate clueless admins."  :-)

And, mysteriously,                      OK           OK # -- marketsharp idiots --      OK                       OK          OK         OK      OK     OK

Lessee... Okay, from a sample, about 85% of 'em no longer resolve!

perl -e 'while (<>){$y{$1}++  if /ref (\d\d\d\d)\d\d\d\d/};for (sort
 keys %y){printf "%4d %5d\n",$_,$y{$_}}' dynamic.txt
2003   172 
2004  5785 
2005  2761 
2006  4401 
2007 11714 
2008  5930 
2009   118 

Ran out of quantum before checking against rbl's. :-)

(No, I don't use 'em... was curious and fiddled over lunch. :-))

  lundin at
"In theory there is no difference
   between theory and practice.
 But in practice there is."

More information about the MailScanner mailing list