WARNING: Ignoring deprecated option --unzip

[Jason Ede]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Simon Jones
> Sent: 26 January 2009 16:26
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: WARNING: Ignoring deprecated option --unzip
> 
> 2009/1/26 Simon Jones <simonmjones at gmail.com>:
> > 2009/1/26 Glenn Steen <glenn.steen at gmail.com>:
> >> 2009/1/26 Simon Jones <simonmjones at gmail.com>:
> >>> 2009/1/26 Simon Jones <simonmjones at gmail.com>:
> >>>> 2009/1/26 Glenn Steen <glenn.steen at gmail.com>:
> >>>>> 2009/1/26 Simon Jones <simonmjones at gmail.com>:
> >>>>>> 2009/1/25 Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>:
> >>>>>>> This is documented in the MailScanner ChangeLog. You have
> updated ClamAV,
> >>>>>>> and you require a MailScanner update as well to match the new
> command-line
> >>>>>>> syntax. It was mentioned in my "new version announcement" to
> the
> >>>>>>> MailScanner-Announce list a while back.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 24/1/09 19:47, Simon Jones wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Evening chaps,  gateway still running like a dog!  I've
> noticed in
> >>>>>>>> /var/log/maillog the following;
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Jan 24 19:27:29 mailgate1 MailScanner[6685]: WARNING: Ignoring
> >>>>>>>> deprecated option --unzip
> >>>>>>>> Jan 24 19:27:29 mailgate1 MailScanner[6685]: WARNING: Ignoring
> >>>>>>>> deprecated option --jar
> >>>>>>>> Jan 24 19:27:29 mailgate1 MailScanner[6685]: WARNING: Ignoring
> >>>>>>>> deprecated option --tar
> >>>>>>>> Jan 24 19:27:29 mailgate1 MailScanner[6685]: WARNING: Ignoring
> >>>>>>>> deprecated option --tgz
> >>>>>>>> Jan 24 19:27:29 mailgate1 MailScanner[6685]: WARNING: Ignoring
> >>>>>>>> deprecated option --deb
> >>>>>>>> Jan 24 19:27:29 mailgate1 MailScanner[6685]: WARNING: Ignoring
> >>>>>>>> deprecated option --max-ratio
> >>>>>>>> Jan 24 19:27:29 mailgate1 MailScanner[6685]: WARNING: Ignoring
> >>>>>>>> deprecated option --unrar
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm assuming it won't hurt performance and I'm sure someone's
> come
> >>>>>>>> across this before so if you could point me in the direction
> to the
> >>>>>>>> fix it'd be great,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> thanks
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Simon
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jules
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> hello chaps, thanks for that - I've updated MS and configured it
> to
> >>>>>> use clamd which works a treat, the machines are chewing spam
> like they
> >>>>>> haven't eaten in a month!  I do have a spot of trouble with the
> >>>>>> MailScanner -d --lint test though -
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> bayes: failed rename /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes_journal to
> >>>>>> /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes_journal.old
> >>>>>> bayes: failed rename /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes_journal to
> >>>>>> /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes_journal.old
> >>>>>> bayes: failed rename /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes_journal to
> >>>>>> /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes_journal.old
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Previous error complained of not being able to read the files so
> i
> >>>>>> chown postfix:root * in the directory, now I'm getting the
> above.
> >>>>>> Seems to have fixed the read error though...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> thanks again,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Simon
> >>>>> This is how this looks for me (I use MailWatch where the apache
> user
> >>>>> and group is named "apache"):
> >>>>>
> >>>>> # ls -ld /etc/MailScanner/bayes
> >>>>> drwxrwsrwx 2 postfix apache 4096 2009-01-26 14:58
> /etc/MailScanner/bayes/
> >>>>> # ls -l /etc/MailScanner/bayes
> >>>>> totalt 6004
> >>>>> -rw-rw---- 1 postfix apache    2334 2009-01-26 14:58 bayes.mutex
> >>>>> -rw-r----- 1 apache  apache   12288 2009-01-26 14:58 bayes_seen
> >>>>> -rw-rw---- 1 postfix apache 5984256 2009-01-26 14:58 bayes_toks
> >>>>> #
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> -- Glenn
> >>>>> email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
> >>>>
> >>>> looks good! so simple I didn't think it could be that.  finally
> since
> >>>> the upgrade I'm gettin commit ineffective with AutoCommit enabled
> at
> >>>> /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/CustomFunctions/MailWatch.pm line
> 93,
> >>>> <CLIENT> line 1
> >>>>
> >>>> when i restart the MailScanner service, doesn't seem to be a
> problem
> >>>> but can it be tidied up?
> >>>>
> >>>> Simon
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Guys, also just noticed quite a lot of SA time outs on one of the
> >>> gateways, the other gateways are fine and responding so I don't
> think
> >>> it's a slow blacklist - CPU seems to be IRO 50% on average so the
> >>> system isn't way busy.  Did the MS upgrade break something with SA?
> >>>
> >>> SpamAssassin timed out and was killed, failure 1 of 10
> >>
> >> Check that your bayes_seen file is of a reasonable size, else ...
> >> remove it. Also check that your SA expire runs complete (no "expire"
> >> files in your bayes directory)... Try up the "SpamAssassin Timeout"
> to
> >> something fairly large in /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf (mine is
> >> at 10 minutes... == 600 seconds).
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> --
> >> -- Glenn
> >
> > Hello lads, thanks again - cleaned up the error (thanks Steve, we
> > don't like messy bits do we!) and Glenn, on the money with the
> timeout
> > setting for SA - it was set to 10 secs on the gateway that was
> playing
> > up and 600 on the others, not sure how that happened but I guess the
> > part of the system between the chair and they keyboard may have got
> > distracted!.
> >
> > all working beautifully again!
> >
> > Simon
> >
> slllllooooooooooowwweedddd down to a crawl again and is stacking
> messages in the hold queue.  I can't figure out what's going on here.
> restart MS and it works really fast but leave it to run for five
> minutes or so and the whole things slows to a crawl, it backs up
> messages in the hold queue and is really slow answering on port 25 or
> times out completely.  I've commented out the lists in
> /etc/MailScanner/spam.lists.conf - does SA have any others configured
> somewhere else?  I'm clutching at straws now.  no errors in the lint
> tests and everything seems normal.

It's not starting to swap is it? Have you tried dropping the number of mailscanner processes down a bit?

Jason