ClamAV or ClamD?

[Eduardo Casarero]

2009/1/22 SuprDave <mailscanner.list at romehosting.com>

> Currently using ClamAV.  Any reason why I should not consider switching to
> ClamD?
> Dave Gattis
>
> None! i will speed up your server a lot!! just have some script checking if
clamd is alive.


>
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, SuprDave wrote:
> >>
> >> I set this up last night but noticed that their subject line test fails.
> >> Mail is delivered when placing the test signature in the subject line.
> >> Did anyone else have the same results?
> >
> > When using clamd it quarantines the message OK.  But when using clamav,
> > the signature is detected by clamav but MailScanner lets it go through.
> > This is the reason I changed to clamd!  I noticed this started to happen
> > with a change in December 2007.  Tested with MailScanner-4.74.16-1 today.
> > --
> > MailScanner mailing list
> > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> > http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> >
> > Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> >
> > Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
> >
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20090122/e90df24b/attachment.html