ClamAV or ClamD?

[SuprDave]

Currently using ClamAV.  Any reason why I should not consider switching to
ClamD?
Dave Gattis


>
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, SuprDave wrote:
>>
>> I set this up last night but noticed that their subject line test fails.
>> Mail is delivered when placing the test signature in the subject line.
>> Did anyone else have the same results?
>
> When using clamd it quarantines the message OK.  But when using clamav,
> the signature is detected by clamav but MailScanner lets it go through.
> This is the reason I changed to clamd!  I noticed this started to happen
> with a change in December 2007.  Tested with MailScanner-4.74.16-1 today.
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>