glenn.steen at gmail.com
Tue Feb 3 14:36:08 GMT 2009
2009/2/2 Ghetti, Ron <Ron.Ghetti at town.barnstable.ma.us>:
(snip Steves advice to run sa test by itself)
> Can't seem to get that to work, I have no idea what the postfix password
Why would you need that? It is probably set to something that crypt()
never will be able to emitt...;-).
You have root privs, right? That is all you need to "su" to someone
else (if on Ubuntu or similar, do "sudo -i" to get an interractive
shell as root, then do the "su - postfix -s /bin/bash", then do the
spamassassin command as suggested previously). Didn't you use that
when you posted the second SA thing? I'm confused...:-)
> The numbers do seem a bit better though after adjusting a couple of
> And rewriting my report to pick up more info.
> Batch processess are much shorter and there are much fewer SA timeouts.
> This is from a 24 hour period.
> There were 6,925 Total messages Recieved.
> There were 5,299 messages marked as spam.
> There were 693 Messages Queued for delivery.
> There were 771 Messages Delivered.
> Average Batch Time = 11.6 seconds
> SA Timeouts = 5
> Messages Deferred = 13
> Messages Bounced = 5
Excellent. You do "recipient verification", right? So that you don't
accept mail that have non-existant recipients...
> Spamassassin timeout kicked up to 85 seconds
> MaxChildren set to 12
> Batch Sizes set to 20
> No Virus Scanning
> Using Spamhaus-Zen and uribl
Time to up the SA timeout to 300 and turn virus scanning on, don't you think?
If you run at least clamd, it likely wont hurt you.
> Thanks for all your help
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
More information about the MailScanner