phishing.bad.sites.conf v ScamNailer

Kai Schaetzl maillists at conactive.com
Fri Dec 18 12:31:21 GMT 2009


Robert Lopez wrote on Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:46:43 -0700:

> Unless I am terribly confused, I think ScanNailer == jkf.phishing.

Might be so, I've never tried it.

> I still have these files:
> # ls -l /etc/MailScanner/phishing.*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 134840 2009-12-15 10:24
> /etc/MailScanner/phishing.bad.sites.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   4779 2009-10-20 15:44
> /etc/MailScanner/phishing.safe.sites.conf
> 
> and I am still editing them to insert files into both of them.

So, you have disabled the update script then? (if not it overwrites your 
additions.)
What do you get as output when you run /usr/sbin/update_bad_phishing_sites 
manually? (You want to backup update_bad_phishing_sites before this.)


Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com





More information about the MailScanner mailing list