phishing.bad.sites.conf v ScamNailer
Kai Schaetzl
maillists at conactive.com
Fri Dec 18 12:31:21 GMT 2009
Robert Lopez wrote on Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:46:43 -0700:
> Unless I am terribly confused, I think ScanNailer == jkf.phishing.
Might be so, I've never tried it.
> I still have these files:
> # ls -l /etc/MailScanner/phishing.*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 134840 2009-12-15 10:24
> /etc/MailScanner/phishing.bad.sites.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4779 2009-10-20 15:44
> /etc/MailScanner/phishing.safe.sites.conf
>
> and I am still editing them to insert files into both of them.
So, you have disabled the update script then? (if not it overwrites your
additions.)
What do you get as output when you run /usr/sbin/update_bad_phishing_sites
manually? (You want to backup update_bad_phishing_sites before this.)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list