Preventing multiple signatures in email conversation?
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Apr 28 19:02:19 IST 2009
On 28/04/2009 18:33, Chris Barber wrote:
>>>> From your first paragraph there, are you referring to the "Allow
>>> Multiple HTML Signatures" setting?
>>> I tried that setting using an image
>>> tag without a src and it doesn't work for me because some email
>>> change the<img> tag that is missing the src to an error message and
>>> thus MailScanner won't see it when it comes back in.
>> You could put in the src as the same URL as the Web Bug Replacement in
>> MailScanner.conf. They won't be able to see that, but it will make the
>> img tag correct. And that URL will always be accessible, and widely
>> available as it's hosted by an anycast network of servers scattered
>> around the world.
>>>> From your reply above it sound like there is another way to get
>> Not particularly, should there be another way?
> It might be nice to be able to specify the string MailScanner looks for
> when deciding to include the signature or not. The<img> tag isn't good
> for some of my picky customers who don't like to see the blocked image
> and download warnings when using a client such as Outlook.
> If I could specify the text that MailScanner should look for, I could
> strip the repeat signatures without annoying anyone.
It needs to be in a tag, so I can parse it out easily. That's why I went
for an img tag, as the original person who wanted the feature was going
to use. If you can suggest an additional attribute of a tag it could go
into, I could probably implement that as well. But be warned that all
these things slow it all down even further :-(
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
PGP public key: http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc
Follow me at twitter.com/JulesFM
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner