Found nn messages in the processing-messages database

[Kai Schaetzl]

Rick Cooper wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:25:03 -0400:

> Rather than a random number wouldn't a file checksum or MD5 hash

I rather think there is no need for changing the "original" at all. It 
suffices for sendmail and postfix, why not for MS?

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com