Found nn messages in the processing-messages database

Kai Schaetzl maillists at
Fri Apr 17 19:20:16 IST 2009

Rick Cooper wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:25:03 -0400:

> Rather than a random number wouldn't a file checksum or MD5 hash

I rather think there is no need for changing the "original" at all. It 
suffices for sendmail and postfix, why not for MS?


Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:

More information about the MailScanner mailing list