Found nn messages in the processing-messages database
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Apr 17 09:36:28 IST 2009
On 16/4/09 20:08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 07:37:49AM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Note that the "Found" count doesn't always increase between restarts, but
>> it never decreases. Also, "New Batch: Scanning X messages" in the log are
>> always followed by "Deleted X messages from processing-database" with the
>> same count and over any period, the "Deleted" counts add up to the same
>> total as the "Scanning" counts even where the "Found" count has increased.
> One more piece of information. As I said, I first saw these increasing
> counts after upgrading 4.76.7 to 4.76.10 three days ago and continuing
> after upgrading to 4.76.12 two days ago, but I observe the rate at which
> the count increases is decreasing. It went from 0 to 16 in the first 24
> hours and from 14 to 23 in the next 10 hours, but then it took 14 hours
> to go from 23 to 24 and it has been at 24 for the last 22 hours.
> During this time, I have run "MailScanner --processing" a few times, and
> this always gives no output, so it seems there is some kind of residue
> accummulating in the processing database that is only counted in the
> Found count when a child starts.
"MailScanner --processing" is the same as "MailScanner --processing 1".
If you do "MailScanner --processing 0" you should get some output.
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
Need help customising MailScanner?
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner