Desperately trying to debug poor spam scanning performance

[Denis Beauchemin]

Ben Tisdall a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I've tried over the weekend to optimise spam processing speed on this
> box but with no major gains.
>
> Here's some data that might be useful (jitter is my home box & newacorn
> the not-yet-deployed production box).
>
> Speed Logging
> =============
>
> gmail => test => home
>
> Spam Checks = no
>
> newacorn:
>
> 11:12:31 Spam Checks completed at 43536 bytes per second
>
> jitter:
>
> 11:12:37 Spam Checks completed at 60548 bytes per second
>
> Spam Checks = yes
>
> newacorn:
>
> 11:15:17 Spam Checks completed at 491 bytes per second
>
> jitter:
>
> 11:15:26 Spam Checks completed at 1778 bytes per second
>
>
> bonnie++ results:
> =================
>
> https://jitter.tisdall.org.uk/pub/mstest/ms_disk.html
>
>
> Perl modules diff:
> ==================
>
> https://jitter.tisdall.org.uk/pub/mstest/ms_modules_diff.txt
>
> Let me know if any further info would be helpful.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ben.
>
>   
Ben,

Is newacorn your new machine ? If so, it has really bad I/O figures 
compared to jitter.  Maybe you should investigate into this.

Denis

-- 
   _
  °v°   Denis Beauchemin, analyste
 /(_)\  Université de Sherbrooke, S.T.I.
  ^ ^   T: 819.821.8000x62252 F: 819.821.8045


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3306 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20080915/661552e9/smime.bin