Error with EMTPY_MESSAGE

Hugo van der Kooij hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Sun Sep 14 13:12:35 IST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alex Broens wrote:
> On 9/14/2008 1:04 PM, Glenn Steen wrote:
>> Yes, well... they seem to be indacations of the same thing. So far
>> only observed on CentOS 5.2 boxes (I've had reports that it's working
>> OK on Slackware as well as Mandriva).
> 
> Centos 4.x and older MS release as well (most of my production boxes)

Alex can you compare the list of packages on Centos 4 and Centos 5?
Could this be a revival of past issues with the perl-IO module?

>> The problem is that the "exploding" of the message as read from the
>> queue file fails. It simply returns nothing.
> 
> so that's the bug...

What would it take to write a seperate program that calls upon the
MailScanner code and compare the MailScanner results against postcat?

That way we can find a set of sample queue files to work on and the
difference might tell us why it does not work all the time.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIzP+xBvzDRVjxmYERAnGPAJ4mUxDSeVRHZw9HvK1a5JJB0vwQIACfYycZ
Q+8yTBZH85MpTa25Zcy0cqs=
=CNrx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the MailScanner mailing list