Releasing messages from quarantine
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Nov 11 21:18:23 GMT 2008
On 11/11/08 18:52, Steve Freegard wrote:
> Julian Field wrote:
>> Not quite.
>> When I remove the dangerous attachment from a message, I send the
>> message on with its original Message-ID: header, which I believe is
>> what I should be doing. Otherwise I'll break threads, among other
>> things. Not every recipient of an attachment in (for example) a
>> mailing list thread is interested in receiving that attachment, and
>> having the thread broken as a result.
>> When someone chooses to release a message from the MailWatch
>> quarantine, they don't change the Message-ID: to a new value before
>> sending it. So personally I reckon the ball is in your court. Sites
>> without MailWatch wouldn't want their Message-ID: threads breaking
>> for every message that happened to contain a dodgy attachment the
>> recipient wasn't interested in anyway. Surely it's MailWatch's job to
>> create a new Message-ID: when a message is re-posted with its
>> attachments, now the user has chosen to retrieve them?
>> I just see this as a problem for the implementers of quarantine
>> release mechanisms, not for me.
>> What do you think?
> You're right of course - I'm forgetting that MailScanner can strip
> attachments and deliver the original message.
> I can strip the Message-ID on my end and get the MTA to generate a new
> one automatically; but this is going to break threading as well. I
> guess there is no clean way around this.
Absolutely. One of us has to break the threading, and I think the repeat
message sent at a later date should be the one to do it. Sorry to give
you more work...
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
PGP public key: http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner