ClamAV 0.93 released
ms-list at alexb.ch
Fri May 23 15:18:35 IST 2008
On 5/23/2008 1:21 PM, David Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Denis Beauchemin wrote:
>> Leonardo Helman a écrit :
>>> Hi I'm using clamavmodule
>>> I've made a patch for the Mail::ClamAV to compile (later I'll send it
>>> to the Mail::ClamAV mantainer)
>> Anything new on the official Mail::ClamAV module? I just looked and
>> version 0.21 still supports maxratio which have been removed from Clam
>> Since there are known exploits for 0.92 I am beginning to feel the urge
>> to upgrade to 0.93...
> Scott Beck has released version 0.22 of Mail::ClamAV in the last few days.
> Could I suggest that some of us with test facilities and with a little
> technical experience try the various combinations of the older and newer
> versions of ClamAV and Mail::ClamAV and verify which combinations work and
> 1. Old+old: We know that the combined earlier versions work.
> 2. New ClamAV + old Mail::ClamAV: It has been reported that the new
> ClamAV (0.93) breaks with older Mail::ClamAV (0.20/0.21). Could
> someone provide details of what this breakage is? Is there a quick
> recipe to reproduce the problem that ClamAV 0.93 had introduced?
> 3. New + new: Julian's Clam+SA package would ultimately be new+new. Can
> we verify that this fixes any previously verified breakage? Also that
> it does not seem to introduce any new problems.
> 4. Old ClamAV + new Mail::ClamAV: There are inevitably sites which use
> other sources (not Julian's package). Can we check what happens with
> if someone were to upgrade their Mail::ClamAV module but leave the
> main ClamAV software back on 0.92? (Probably not too important, but
> it would be a nice data point to complete the set...)
> Given Julian's sadly enforced absence from work, I'm sure he would
> appreciate it if we can do this tabulation for him.
Will try to test new Mail::ClamAV with ClamAV 0.93 and on several old
versions of MS
More information about the MailScanner