HTML Footers and Outlook/Word 2003?

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gerard wrote:
| On Wed, 21 May 2008 15:31:33 +0200
| Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org> wrote:
|
|> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Paul Hutchings wrote:
|> | I’m not sure if this is an Outlook/Word issue or something to do
|> with my | html signature code or how MailScanner appends signatures,
|> so I’ll start | here.
|>
|> Have you had one look at the messages your MTA is sending out? The
|> HTML is ackward at best.
|>
|> There must be 50 ways to leave Microsoft. You just have shown reason
|> number 501.
|>
|> But the obvious way is to start a packet capture and capture the
|> outgoing messages before and after MailScanner and see what has
|> changed exactly.
|>
|> But the fact that something reappears before it even is send to
|> MailScanner pretty much rules out any change it was changed by
|> MailScanner.
|
| Actually, I have no trouble at all understanding the HTML code. It
| might appear awkward because it is sent in:
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
|
| format. Sending it in 8-bit format would probably clear up that
| problem.

That is not the issue. If you feed the output to a W3C parser it will
tell you all about all the errors. Wether or not you think you can read
it is not that relevant.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFINGG2BvzDRVjxmYERAvS8AJoDJpGOlZZXBMmQXjx8ybTikb37fwCeIn4S
nsi+BWjUIacXgNyJEFczYVA=
=7jYF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----