preventing backscatter at the source
Hugo van der Kooij
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Sat Mar 29 08:23:42 GMT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mark Nienberg wrote:
| Steve Freegard wrote:
|
|> 2) Don't run a secondary MX unless it is configured to reject exactly
|> as the primary.
|> A secondary MX delivering to the primary MX which does an SMTP
|> rejection will cause the secondary MX to 'bounce' the message which is
|> backscatter.
|
| Uh oh, this is a bit harder. I have my ISP functioning as my secondary
| MX, so it really isn't under my control. I guess I could ask them if
| they use milter-ahead or some other method.
I have seen one ISP do a smart thing here. Their SMTP backup servers
will monitor your system. Unless your system is down there is no need
for them to accept email on your behalf.
Hugo.
- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH7fyMBvzDRVjxmYERAoJcAJ4r1jJfltQj94C/mIdsQBd8WBF7WQCeL4yd
f68ftOoOVDJ1if4wjTPc2V4=
=7wV3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list