relays.ordb.org blacklisting all IPs
Mike Kercher
mkercher at nfsmith.com
Tue Mar 25 17:47:53 GMT 2008
I found the same thing when an old friend called me up asking why his
mail server was rejecting everything.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Stephen
Swaney
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:02 PM
To: 'MailScanner discussion'
Subject: relays.ordb.org blacklisting all IPs
Dear all,
You might note that relays.ordb.org, which has been dead for a while,
has just blacklisted the world. If you are blocking at the MTA level
using this site you are probably not receiving any mail as a result of
this change.
Best regards,
Steve
Steve Swaney
steve at fsl.com
www.fsl.com
Steve Swaney
steve at fsl.com
Office Phone: 202 595-7760 ext. 601
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Marco Barbero
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:33 PM
> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Subject: mailscanner/postfix issue (this is going to make me mad)
>
> Hi all
>
> Scenario is the following:
> Dual Xeon Quad Core 4GB Ram
> Debian Etch, custom kernel 2.6.24.3
>
> A) At the first I use the following env:
>
> MTA: postfix
> MailScanner 4.67.6
> SpamAssassin 3.2.4
> Razor , DCC
> vispan (only for spam stats)
> avira antivir
>
> I use drbd 8.2.5 for network mirroring (using heartbeat 1.2.5) of
> postfix/mailscanner queues and for mailscanner quarantine and bayes.
>
> I use list.dsbl.org and dnsbl.njabl.org, plus I have spamhaus feed
> using rbldnsd and rsync. All the dnsbl are set on postfix
> configuration
>
> I use avira antivir like Virus Scanner.
>
> Had to say this is not my first experience with MailScanner. I'm using
> it since 2004 with success using both sendmail and postfix like MTA.
>
> This time this scenario has a high traffic mail (about 3/4 millions
> every month).
> Ok after debugging both mailscanner and spamassassin I tried to put
> the thing in production environment.
>
> After a while I noticed queues began to grow. I look at logs and seems
> problem appears during requeing (so after mailscanner checks). In
> short words: it works but it's slow and delays are noticeable.
> vmstat and top doesn't show any important bottleneck. Postfix smtpd
> processes grows fast and they reach max in a few time.
> So I tried to block port 25 using a firewall and in 1 minute all
> queues empties....
>
>
> B) So I tried to do this (thinking about postfix developers not
> loving Mailscanner) MTA on port 25: Postfix MTA on port 26:
> Sendmail/MailScanner
>
> So Postfix receives mail from Internet and then send them to Sendmail
> on port 26 that call MailScanner.
> Run the test and issue persists. And are always postfix queues to fill
> up. Postfix people says that this happens because of postfix rate
> limit, so I cannot blame Postfix for this. For postfix people problem
> is still on MailScanner.
>
> C) So I tried this:
> MTA on port 25: Sendmail
> all other pieces of software like first env
>
> Things do not come better. Delays persist and sendmail suffer.
> I tried two things:
> 1) disable spam checks and issue persists
> 2) disable mailscanner at all with no issue
>
>
> D) So I tried to use Sendmail but downgrade MailScanner to 4.61.7 (a
> release I'm sure it's working well since I have it in other recent
> production environment).
>
> And... it works with no more issues. Delays now are few seconds
> (againts 5-10-20 minutes)
>
> Ah..so problem is MailScanner 4.67!?!? All rights, let's put again
> Postfix using MailScanner 4.61.
> I do that and issue come back again......
>
> So let's sum up:
>
> Postfix 2.3.8 + MailScanner 4.67 = ISSUES
> Postfix 2.3.8 + Sendmail 8.13 + MailScanner 4.67 = ISSUES Sendmail
> 8.13 + MailScanner 4.67 = ISSUES Sendmail 8.13 + MailScanner 4.61 =
> WORKS WITH NO ISSUES!!!!
> Postfix 2.3.8 + MailScanner 4.61 = ISSUES
>
> This makes me mad. Why this happens?
>
> Like said before I have similar working installations (less traffic
> and using clamav in place of antivir). What's happening this time?
>
> It seems postfix related (always) and mailscanner related (4.67)
>
> Maybe postfix related?
> Maybe mailscanner related?
> Maybe drbd related?
>
> Any helps or hints will be appreciated
>
> Adding: during postfix tests, I noticed in logs this:
> MailScanner[10310]: Cannot lock /tmp/AntiVirBusy.lock, Permission
> denied
>
> /tmp/AntiVirBusy.lock is 600 Putting it 777 suppress log but does
> not resolve performance issue.
> This does not appear at all using sendmail
>
>
> Thanks
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list