Once more, this time no html, sorry: does "is.definitely.spam" yield SA training?

[Matt Kettler]

Julian Field wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> Furnish, Trever G wrote:
>> Was a bit surprised no one replied to this one the first time (March
>> 7th), but then I realized I'd sent it in html.  Sorry. :-/  Must have
>> been a bad week.
>>
>> ----------------
>>
>> If a message is marked as spam thanks to being caught by an "Is
>> Definitely Spam" rule, does that message get passed to spamassassin for
>> training Bayes?
>>   
> Not unless you choose to Always Include SpamAssassin Report. Otherwise 
> it's mostly a waste of cycles.

And even then, it won't result in training unless it happens to meet SA's 
autolearning criteria.. Correct?

i.e.: "Is Definitely Spam" won't actually change anything about the call to 
SpamAssassin, but may leave SA entirely out if "Always Include SpamAsasssin 
Report" is disabled (which it is the default).