Once more, this time no html, sorry: does "is.definitely.spam" yield SA training?

[Julian Field]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Furnish, Trever G wrote:
> Was a bit surprised no one replied to this one the first time (March
> 7th), but then I realized I'd sent it in html.  Sorry. :-/  Must have
> been a bad week.
>
> ----------------
>
> If a message is marked as spam thanks to being caught by an "Is
> Definitely Spam" rule, does that message get passed to spamassassin for
> training Bayes?
>   
Not unless you choose to Always Include SpamAssassin Report. Otherwise 
it's mostly a waste of cycles.

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
PGP public key: http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.8.2 (Build 3005)
Comment: Use Thunderbird Enigmail to verify this message
Charset: ISO-8859-1

wj8DBQFH5936EfZZRxQVtlQRAjfUAKDqTic5uz7WFPzRsUoQJdjtc0o4zgCeNsZK
pA158oZ98GOsN18UQR1Iu4w=
=NQou
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.