Spamassassin autolearn?

Hugo van der Kooij hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Sat Jun 28 14:20:45 IST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andy Peterson wrote:
| Hi all.
|
| I've been running MailScanner for a few days now, and I must say that
| I'm very satisfied with it. It's running very smoothly for me, however,
| I've encountered one problem, and that's spamassassin's bayes autolearn
| isn't working. It appears that spamassassin is using only rules, even
| though bayes_auto_learn should be enabled (I've fed sa-learn with >200
| spam and ham messages). Yet, it refuse to autolearn which force me to
| learn the tokens manually on every message, which is a bit of a pain.

How do you learn those messages exactly? And do you train the actual
database that MS is using?

Please read other threads about things to check with bayesian databases.
~ (I do hope you understand the concepts of threads in mailinglists.)

Hugo.


- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIZjqsBvzDRVjxmYERAlLSAJ99QohxqYM/3whJx5W0TF+e8299GwCdFfWz
pAQ+FGq+0hQUpY4RdArrN5E=
=zxRd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the MailScanner mailing list