Watermark and User Notification

[Julian Field]

Scott Silva wrote:
> on 6-12-2008 1:10 PM Julian Field spake the following:
>>
>>
>> Donnie D. Quindardo wrote:
>>> - Configure MailScanner to notify users that their attachments have 
>>> been  blocked.
>>>
>>> - Configure MailScanner to use Watermarks and note that messages 
>>> that have no sender and no watermark are spam.
>>>
>>> - Send an e-mail through MailScanner with an attachment that is 
>>> banned, perhaps "test.com".
>>>
>>> - Look in the spam quarantine of MailScanner, the notification 
>>> e-mail that is sent to the user is there. That's because it is sent 
>>> with an envelope address of <> and does not get a MailScanner 
>>> Signature beforehand.
>> In which case you just need to use a ruleset to exempt mail from 
>> 127.0.0.1 from watermarking checks. Should I do this automatically in 
>> the code, or are there situations in which this isn't the desired 
>> behaviour?
>>
>> Jules
>>
> Does a ruleset on scan messages also cover this, or is watermarking 
> outside that catch-all?
You don't need to do anything that radical, you just need a ruleset on 
the option that controls the checking of watermarks.

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
PGP public key: http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.