Spamassassin rules

[Alex Broens]

On 6/4/2008 3:40 PM, Devon Harding wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Devon Harding <devonharding at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>> If you get hit by messages with URL's I suggest you use URIBL. That
>>> seems to get most of them. And for those that passed. I suggest you add
>>> them to the URIBL by recommending them.
>>>
>>> Hugo.
>>>
>> I thought URIBL was enabled by default in SA 3.2.4?  How can I verify this?
>>
>> -Devon
>>
> 
> 
> Hmm...I noticed these lines commented in /etc/mail/spamassassin/
> mailscanner.cf.  Is this it?
> 
> #
> # Julian Field Fri Apr 28 2006
> #
> # Added the "Black" and "Grey" URIBL lists from www.uribl.com
> #
> #
> #urirhssub       URIBL_BLACK  multi.uribl.com.        A   2
> #body            URIBL_BLACK  eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_BLACK')
> #describe        URIBL_BLACK  Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
> #tflags          URIBL_BLACK  net
> #score           URIBL_BLACK  3.0
> #
> #urirhssub       URIBL_GREY  multi.uribl.com.        A   4
> #body            URIBL_GREY  eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_GREY')
> #describe        URIBL_GREY  Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist
> #tflags          URIBL_GREY  net
> #score           URIBL_GREY  0.25
> 
> 

the rules are in 25_uribl.cf

Julian's entries are obsolete and should be removed.
(left over from the days when Uribl.com wasn't yet included in SA)

Alex