Google gmail

[Peter Farrow]

> At 01:58 PM 7/23/2008, you wrote:
>
>
>> Gerard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:02 +0200
>>> "Marco mangione"
>>>
>>> <marco.mangione at gmail.com> <mailto:marco.mangione at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>  
>>>       
>>>>
>>>> uhm.. and what do you suggest for greylisting? gmail have too much
>>>> server that reply...
>>>>    
>>>>         
>>>
>>> Would you please hit the 'plain-text' button when replying from GMail.
>>> This HTML crap is a real PIA. You might also consider losing the
>>> 'top-posting' habit as well.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, doing a scorched earth policy regarding GMail might
>>> result in unexpected consequences. How much SPAM from GMail is actually
>>> getting past your filters anyway?
>>>
>>>   
>> Get with program this is the 21st Century, I don't have any issues 
>> with html, and can work from a top posted reply  too.
>>
>> You could always ask him to send it written in crayon on piece of 
>> papyrus strapped to a pigeons leg.....
>>
>> :-)
>
> The Apache group would give HTML replies a score toward spam. 
> Yesterday, had someone posting with a bad MX record and HTML. The HTML 
> set him over the threshold and got him blocked.
>
> Cheers!
> --
That would be a flase positive then,  if html emails give you false 
positives, your scoring stratgey needs modification...

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Inexcom system Scanner,
and is believed to be clean.
Advanced heuristic mail scanning server [-].
http://www.inexcom.co.uk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20080724/09aa4630/attachment-0001.html