<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:200807231831.m6NIVvDH013179@mxt.1bigthink.com"
type="cite">At 01:58 PM 7/23/2008, you wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite="">Gerard wrote: <br>
<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite=""><br>
<pre>On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:02 +0200
"Marco mangione"
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:marco.mangione@gmail.com">
<marco.mangione@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite=""><br>
<pre>uhm.. and what do you suggest for greylisting? gmail have too much
server that reply...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre>Would you please hit the 'plain-text' button when replying from GMail.
This HTML crap is a real PIA. You might also consider losing the
'top-posting' habit as well.
Unfortunately, doing a scorched earth policy regarding GMail might
result in unexpected consequences. How much SPAM from GMail is actually
getting past your filters anyway?
</pre>
</blockquote>
Get
with program this is the 21st Century, I don't have any issues with
html,
and can work from a top posted reply too.<br>
<br>
You could always ask him to send it written in crayon on piece of
papyrus
strapped to a pigeons leg.....<br>
<br>
:-)</blockquote>
<br>
The Apache group would give HTML replies a score toward spam.
Yesterday,
had someone posting with a bad MX record and HTML. The HTML set him
over
the threshold and got him blocked.<br>
<br>
Cheers!<br>
--<br>
</blockquote>
That would be a flase positive then, if html emails give you false
positives, your scoring stratgey needs modification...<br>
</body>
<br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by the
<a href="http://www.inexcom.co.uk/"><b>Inexcom</b></a> system scanner,
<br />and is believed to be clean.
<br />Advanced heuristic mail scanning server [-].
</html>