F-secure alternative?

[Peter Farrow]

Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Nils Olav Brandstorp Bekken wrote:
> | Since the updates for 4.65 is gone, I'm looking for
> | an alternative. Our systems (Debian Etch) and MailScanner
> | doesn't seem very happy with the F-Secure 5 version, and I'm not 
> sure if
> | F-Secure 7 is supported yet. (It scans and find infected email, but
> | they're delivered anyway)
> |
> | I've tried Clamav but I'm not sure about how frequently
> | it is updated.
>
> More frequent then just about any other malware scanner.
>
> Hugo.
>
> - --
> hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
>     A: Yes.
>     >Q: Are you sure?
>     >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>     >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIh1szBvzDRVjxmYERArozAJ91cJ/Ru13cmFuSfuAbOO/c2X6Y3ACdHDnw
> 2EUsaeaIZjV5HDnALOxjD/Q=
> =jUZC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Yes I would agree with that, I just posted AVAST as a a solution as I 
thought since he was using f-secure he wanted a commercial alternative.
Myself I use clamav and sh*tdefender sorry bitdefender.....  bitdefender 
is sort of an "also ran", you don't really need both if you have clamav.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Inexcom system Scanner,
and is believed to be clean.
Advanced heuristic mail scanning server [-].
http://www.inexcom.co.uk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20080723/b036db99/attachment.html