Watch it: Multiple DNS implementationsvulnerableto cachepoisoning

[Anthony Cartmell]

> Another good example of why Fedora is not the best choice for a server  
> if it
> is going to be expected to operate more than 18 months

...unless you're happy to upgrade on a roughly annual basis to benefit  
 from more up-to-date stable versions of the main packages, such as perl,  
apache, MySQL, PHP, etc.
(see problems installing recent MainScanner versions on machines with old  
perl installations earlier)

We've been here before - Fedora is an excellent server OS for people like  
me, running web servers requiring up-to-date packages. It may not be if  
your situation means upgrading OS versions is expensive and you have no  
need for recent software packages installed automatically.

Cheers!

Anthony
-- 
www.fonant.com - Quality web sites