filename checks = wrong filename report

Matt Kettler mkettler at evi-inc.com
Thu Jul 10 18:30:07 IST 2008


Scott Silva wrote:
> on 7-9-2008 3:19 PM Matt Kettler spake the following:
>> See, nothing happened, did it? Even if it was thousands of characters 
>> long, it would be no different, because it's in the body text.
> How about when that longscaryfilename..... gets sent to syslog. That is 
> another reason to sanitize the names.

But in the example posted to this thread syslog gets the unsanitized version..

It is only the in-body text report which gets the sanitized version. This seems 
a bit backwards to me.




More information about the MailScanner mailing list