filename checks = wrong filename report
Matt Kettler
mkettler at evi-inc.com
Thu Jul 10 18:30:07 IST 2008
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 7-9-2008 3:19 PM Matt Kettler spake the following:
>> See, nothing happened, did it? Even if it was thousands of characters
>> long, it would be no different, because it's in the body text.
> How about when that longscaryfilename..... gets sent to syslog. That is
> another reason to sanitize the names.
But in the example posted to this thread syslog gets the unsanitized version..
It is only the in-body text report which gets the sanitized version. This seems
a bit backwards to me.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list