ClamAV 0.93 released

[Greg Matthews]

sorry to revive such an old thread, but...

David Lee wrote:
> Scott Beck has released version 0.22 of Mail::ClamAV in the last few days.
> 
> Could I suggest that some of us with test facilities and with a little
> technical experience try the various combinations of the older and newer
> versions of ClamAV and Mail::ClamAV and verify which combinations work and
> fail?

was this ever confirmed? I think Jules still uses clamavmodule so I'm 
guessing its probably ok, just not seen it confirmed on the list.

thanks

GREG


> 
>  1. Old+old:  We know that the combined earlier versions work.
> 
>  2. New ClamAV + old Mail::ClamAV:  It has been reported that the new
>     ClamAV (0.93) breaks with older Mail::ClamAV (0.20/0.21).  Could
>     someone provide details of what this breakage is?  Is there a quick
>     recipe to reproduce the problem that ClamAV 0.93 had introduced?
> 
>  3. New + new: Julian's Clam+SA package would ultimately be new+new.  Can
>     we verify that this fixes any previously verified breakage?  Also that
>     it does not seem to introduce any new problems.
> 
>  4. Old ClamAV + new Mail::ClamAV: There are inevitably sites which use
>     other sources (not Julian's package).  Can we check what happens with
>     if someone were to upgrade their Mail::ClamAV module but leave the
>     main ClamAV software back on 0.92?  (Probably not too important, but
>     it would be a nice data point to complete the set...)
> 
> Given Julian's sadly enforced absence from work, I'm sure he would
> appreciate it if we can do this tabulation for him.
> 
> 


-- 
Greg Matthews           01491 692445
Head of UNIX/Linux, iTSS Wallingford

-- 
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.