SpamAssassin 3.2.5 woes

Julian Field MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Jul 1 12:24:28 IST 2008



Steffan Henke wrote:
>
> I am still debugging my SpamAssassin problems - meanwhile I noticed 
> that the only rules that ever increase the score are Botnet and one 
> KAM rule:
>
> SpamAssassin (nicht gecached, Wertung=2, benoetigt 5.5, KAM_BADIPHTTP 
> 2.00)
> SpamAssassin (nicht gecached, Wertung=2, benoetigt 5.5, 
> autolearn=disabled, BOTNET 2.00)
>
> - the majority of all emails is still not marked at all - which is the 
> reason I disabled autolearning by now:
>
> SpamAssassin (nicht gecached, Wertung=0, benoetigt 5.5, 
> autolearn=disabled)
>
> SA itself is working as it always was, spamd is running in combination 
> with spamass-milter.
>
> I wonder why still no tests show up in MailScanner however:
>
> 10:27:20 [13867] dbg: check: tests=
> 10:27:20 [13867] dbg: check: subtests=__BOTNET_NOTRUST
This is odd. I use exactly the same MailScanner distribution as the rest 
of you, and the same SA install as you, and mine are working fine.

Can we start collecting evidence to try to discern some commonality 
between these systems where it's not working please?

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list