Question about white and blacklisting in Mailscanner

Julian Field MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Jul 1 09:10:10 IST 2008



Jonas Akrouh Larsen wrote:
>
> Hi all (Jules)
>
> For some time i have been wondering if what I want to do is possible 
> with MailScanner.
>
> I use the mailwatch database for white and blacklisting.
>
> For those not using mailwatch this means I set
>
> Is Definitely Not Spam = &SQLWhitelist
>
> Is Definitely Spam = &SQLBlacklist
>
> Which makes mailscanner do a lookup to check if a mail is white or 
> blacklisted.
>
> Now what has always wondered me is why both white and blacklisted mail 
> are STILL processed through spamassin regardless of their status.
>
That should only happen if you have asked to always get a SpamAssassin 
report.
>
> My logic is: If something is blacklisted I do not want to waste 
> resources on scanning it, since it won’t be delivered anyway.
>
> The reverse can be true for some locations I guess, ie. Not wanting to 
> scan white listed mails.
>
> At the very least I think it would make sense to make it an option, so 
> those with plenty of resources to spare can keep stats etc accurate by 
> still scanning the mails.
>
> So my question is: Can I make mailscanner 4.70.7-1 do this, or is it 
> not possible do save cpu/ram/network in this way with the current code?
>
> I guess maybe Jules is the best to answer, but I’m sure somebody else 
> might know as well.
>
> Best regards
>
> Jonas A. Larsen
>

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list