SA 3.2.4 lint output oddity

Julian Field MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Mon Jan 21 21:50:21 GMT 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Is your debug output showing that it's reading /usr/share/spamassassin 
or /var/lib/spamassassin?
The output is caused by this rule in KAM.cf:
meta        KAM_RPTR_PASSED        (__KAM_RPTR_PASSED && (URIBL_SBL + 
URIBL_SC_SURBL + URIBL_WS_SURBL + URIBL_PH_SURBL + URIBL_OB_SURBL +  
URIBL_AB_SURBL + URIBL_JP_SURBL + RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET + 
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL + RCVD_IN_XBL + KAM_SPAMJDR < 1))

and for some reason it isn't finding the URIBL_SBL definition in
25_uribl.cf:body        URIBL_SBL    eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBL')

Is anyone else seeing the same behaviour?

Paul Kelly:: Blacknight wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On the last 2 machines I've installed I'm seeing the following output 
> from running:
>
> MailScanner --debug --debug-sa
>
> [8786] dbg: rules: meta test KAM_RPTR_PASSED has undefined dependency 
> 'URIBL_SBL'
> [8786] dbg: rules: meta test KAM_RPTR_PASSED has undefined dependency 
> 'URIBL_SC_SURBL'
> [8786] dbg: rules: meta test KAM_RPTR_PASSED has undefined dependency 
> 'URIBL_WS_SURBL'
> [8786] dbg: rules: meta test KAM_RPTR_PASSED has undefined dependency 
> 'URIBL_PH_SURBL'
> [8786] dbg: rules: meta test KAM_RPTR_PASSED has undefined dependency 
> 'URIBL_OB_SURBL'
> [8786] dbg: rules: meta test KAM_RPTR_PASSED has undefined dependency 
> 'URIBL_AB_SURBL'
> [8786] dbg: rules: meta test KAM_RPTR_PASSED has undefined dependency 
> 'URIBL_JP_SURBL'
> [8786] dbg: rules: meta test KAM_RPTR_PASSED has undefined dependency 
> 'RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL'
>
> There are more, but I said there's isn't much point in pasting them all.
>
> Any idea a) why they are appearing and what I might be missing? I've 
> satisfied mailscanners perl module tastes, i.e. output from 
> MailScanner -V is happy that most perl modules are installed.
>
> I also note, I've not seen any URIBL hits at all in the logs but this 
> could easily be because there isn't huge volumes of mail going through 
> the system yet. But again I could be missing something.
>
> For reference MailScanner -V output is here:
> http://pastebin.com/m28041620
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> thanks,
>
> Paul

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
PGP public key: http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.7.0 (Build 1012)
Comment: Use Thunderbird's Enigmail add-on to verify this message
Charset: ISO-8859-1

wj8DBQFHlROkEfZZRxQVtlQRAnjKAJ41hoETittNWFpdYMomOX81k0cXRQCfegW2
EDMWKIqsWcjIoPej73pO//0=
=P5Ro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list