Let postfix bypass MailScanner for specific recipients

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Drew Marshall wrote:
| On 13 Jan 2008, at 16:08, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
|
|> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> UxBoD wrote:
|> | Sorry, being dumb today! That wouldn't make any difference anyway as
|> each line of the header is parsed.
|>
|> We need to have some sort of AND function on 2 regexp in postfix.
|>
|> Hugo.
|
| Hugo
|
| I have tried, with out success to do something similar before. The
| problem is that Postfix doesn't have any 'not' or 'and' rule
| understanding, which is pretty limiting, however, there might be an
option.
|
| How does postfix receive your time critical mail? Is it possible to
| inject it using the sendmail binary? If so you can set a regex to only
| hold mail based on your server ID like thus:
|
| /^Received:(.*)by your\.mail-server\.name \(Postfix\)/   HOLD

I will receive it from various remote servers (1 for now) by SMTP.

Basically I send it with a custom perlscript to a remote SMTP server to
start the timer and at the end of the chain it gets send back to me so I
know the whole SMTP chain is alive and how long it took to process
through the chain.

The concept was deviced over a drink last friday night and by now the
SMTP chain works I just need to parse the results and setup alerting if
certain steps take to long.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHimq+BvzDRVjxmYERAreCAJ4m4vKa6UgZTyWPP5eq+YWB5Kpm1QCffPO6
Jp0ZDgAeNBDK5bqCTMymXkE=
=lxwN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----