Skipping SpamAssassin if sender is on an RBL

[Vlad Mazek]

Tried that earlier today, no difference in behavior. MailScanner finds it on
SBL+XBL but proceeds to put it through SA anyhow.

-Vlad

On 2/7/08, Richard Frovarp <Richard.Frovarp at sendit.nodak.edu> wrote:
>
> Vlad Mazek wrote:
> > Nope, still gets processed by MailScanner:
> >
> > Feb  7 17:18:45 MailScanner[18224]: RBL checks: m17M9lxS016045 found
> > in SBL+XBL
> > Feb  7 17:18:46 inbound42 MailScanner[18224]: SpamAssassin cache hit
> > for message m17M9lxS016045
> > Feb  7 17:18:46 MailScanner[18224]: Message m17M9lxS016045 from
> > *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:*
> > 75.63.44.11 <http://75.63.44.11> (ka at creativeholidays.com.au
> > <mailto:ka at creativeholidays.com.au>) to rmel.org <http://rmel.org> is
> > spam, SBL+XBL, SpamAssassin (cached, score=23.378, required 5,
> > autolearn=disabled, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50,
> > RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 1.50, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 1.50,
> > RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 2.19, RCVD_IN_XBL 2.90,
> > STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.00, TVD_FINGER_02 2.72, URIBL_BLACK 1.96,
> > URIBL_JP_SURBL 2.86, URIBL_OB_SURBL 2.13, URIBL_SC_SURBL 2.52,
> > URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.10)
> >
> > Notice that it still passes it through SpamAssassin.
> >
> > I have the the following in my MailScanner.conf:
> >
> > Spam List = SBL+XBL
> > Spam Lists To Be Spam = 1
> > Spam Lists To Reach High Score = 1
> >
> > -Vlad
>
> Try:
> Spam Lists To Be Spam = 0
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20080207/228df152/attachment.html