Skipping SpamAssassin if sender is on an RBL

[Richard Frovarp]

Vlad Mazek wrote:
> Nope, still gets processed by MailScanner:
>
> Feb  7 17:18:45 MailScanner[18224]: RBL checks: m17M9lxS016045 found 
> in SBL+XBL
> Feb  7 17:18:46 inbound42 MailScanner[18224]: SpamAssassin cache hit 
> for message m17M9lxS016045
> Feb  7 17:18:46 MailScanner[18224]: Message m17M9lxS016045 from 
> *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:* 
> 75.63.44.11 <http://75.63.44.11> (ka at creativeholidays.com.au 
> <mailto:ka at creativeholidays.com.au>) to rmel.org <http://rmel.org> is 
> spam, SBL+XBL, SpamAssassin (cached, score=23.378, required 5, 
> autolearn=disabled, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50, 
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 1.50, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 1.50, 
> RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 2.19, RCVD_IN_XBL 2.90, 
> STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.00, TVD_FINGER_02 2.72, URIBL_BLACK 1.96, 
> URIBL_JP_SURBL 2.86, URIBL_OB_SURBL 2.13, URIBL_SC_SURBL 2.52, 
> URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.10)
>
> Notice that it still passes it through SpamAssassin.
>
> I have the the following in my MailScanner.conf:
>
> Spam List = SBL+XBL
> Spam Lists To Be Spam = 1
> Spam Lists To Reach High Score = 1
>
> -Vlad

Try:
 Spam Lists To Be Spam = 0