{Disarmed} Re: Skipping SpamAssassin if sender is on an RBL

[Scott Silva]

on 2/7/2008 3:51 PM Vlad Mazek spake the following:
> Someone already recommend that; No, putting the RBLs at the MTA would 
> reject the message, I still need to be able to store it in case someone 
> wants to retrieve false positive.
> 
> Also, putting RBL's on the MTA eliminates any whitelisting that would be 
> provided by MailScanner.
> 
True. But nothing gets a mail administrator off his a$$ to fix his systems 
better than all his mail getting rejected during the initial smtp phase!

-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20080207/a5610baa/signature.bin