Skipping SpamAssassin if sender is on an RBL

[Vlad Mazek]

Always Include SpamAssassin Report = no
Log Spam = yes
Detailed Spam Report = yes

I'll flip the "Log Spam" to off and see if it makes a difference.

The Always Include SpamAssassin Report is set to no though, I remember a
discussion on here about it Matt.

I have now flipped all three to no, let's see what it does...

-Vlad


On 2/7/08, shuttlebox <shuttlebox at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2008 11:21 PM, Vlad Mazek <v at vladville.com> wrote:
> > Nope, still gets processed by MailScanner:
> >
> > Feb  7 17:18:45 MailScanner[18224]: RBL checks: m17M9lxS016045 found in
> > SBL+XBL
> > Feb  7 17:18:46 inbound42 MailScanner[18224]: SpamAssassin cache hit for
> > message m17M9lxS016045
> >  Feb  7 17:18:46 MailScanner[18224]: Message m17M9lxS016045 from
> 75.63.44.11
> > (ka at creativeholidays.com.au) to rmel.org is spam, SBL+XBL, SpamAssassin
> > (cached, score=23.378, required 5, autolearn=disabled,
> > RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 1.50,
> > RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 1.50, RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50,
> RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
> > 2.19, RCVD_IN_XBL 2.90, STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.00, TVD_FINGER_02 2.72,
> > URIBL_BLACK 1.96, URIBL_JP_SURBL 2.86, URIBL_OB_SURBL 2.13,
> URIBL_SC_SURBL
> > 2.52, URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.10)
> >
> > Notice that it still passes it through SpamAssassin.
>
> What do have on?
>
> Log Spam
> Detailed Spam Report
> Always Include SpamAssassin Report
>
> Those options may force SA to be run. Test with different settings on
> them.
>
> --
> /peter
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>



-- 

-Vlad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20080207/d72ba98b/attachment.html