Skipping SpamAssassin if sender is on an RBL

[shuttlebox]

On Feb 7, 2008 11:21 PM, Vlad Mazek <v at vladville.com> wrote:
> Nope, still gets processed by MailScanner:
>
> Feb  7 17:18:45 MailScanner[18224]: RBL checks: m17M9lxS016045 found in
> SBL+XBL
> Feb  7 17:18:46 inbound42 MailScanner[18224]: SpamAssassin cache hit for
> message m17M9lxS016045
>  Feb  7 17:18:46 MailScanner[18224]: Message m17M9lxS016045 from 75.63.44.11
> (ka at creativeholidays.com.au) to rmel.org is spam, SBL+XBL, SpamAssassin
> (cached, score=23.378, required 5, autolearn=disabled,
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 1.50,
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 1.50, RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
> 2.19, RCVD_IN_XBL 2.90, STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.00, TVD_FINGER_02 2.72,
> URIBL_BLACK 1.96, URIBL_JP_SURBL 2.86, URIBL_OB_SURBL 2.13, URIBL_SC_SURBL
> 2.52, URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.10)
>
> Notice that it still passes it through SpamAssassin.

What do have on?

Log Spam
Detailed Spam Report
Always Include SpamAssassin Report

Those options may force SA to be run. Test with different settings on them.

-- 
/peter