Definite Fraud?

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jay Chandler wrote:
| I'm sure this has been rehashed before, but...
|
|
| *MailScanner has detected definite fraud in the website at
| "tinyurl.com". Do /not/ trust this website:* http://tinyurl.com/blah
| <http://tinyurl.com/2b5l4w>
|
|
| Obviously it's detecting the 301 redirect, but that doesn't necessarily
| bespeak fraud.  There are a lot of non-fraudulent things that it could
| be, ranging from shock pictures to Rick Rolls to inredibly long URLs.
|
| Has anyone discussed changing the wording here?

The 301 redirect is not considered.

But as /blah is not identical to /2b514w there is an issue with an URL
being hidden.

The wording of the message is in fact your job as an adminstrator. That
is why the text is in seperate langauge files. If you use templates
without a changes and accept them then that is your choice but in this
case the wording is yours to change.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHqqeOBvzDRVjxmYERAibEAKCR81EoRtyyO9fZuSX4ytFAQ4mZcACfWLgN
Ab3Ovs5FhJD58zhe5+9ZecU=
=vEzq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----