AW: Not completely OT: Does this affect MailScanner users on RH/FC/CentOS?

Ken A ka at
Fri Aug 29 20:52:46 IST 2008

Richard Frovarp wrote:
> Alex Neuman van der Hans wrote:
>> How much of an improvement? Can you describe both the test and the 
>> manual perl compile process and put it up on the wiki?

> The test doesn't use MailScanner. We have RHEL 4 and RHEL 5 boxes 
> running MS. Doing the test RHEL 4 is fine, and RHEL5 isn't. However, we 
> have not noticed any performance difference between the two releases 
> when it comes to running MS.

Same here, but with FC6 buggy perl. It would be nice to know if 
MailScanner is affected in any significant way. Why upgrade perl for new 
bugs when the old ones work fine?


Ken Anderson

More information about the MailScanner mailing list