AW: AW: Not completely OT: Does this affect MailScanner users on RH/FC/CentOS?

[Ehle, Roland]

Partially agree, but we were not talking about encouraging people to compile their own perl. For all other cases:

Read the patient information leaflet and ask your doctor or pharmacist about risks and side effects. :-)

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] Im Auftrag von Christopher J. Buckley
> Gesendet: Freitag, 29. August 2008 21:24
> An: MailScanner discussion
> Betreff: Re: AW: Not completely OT: Does this affect MailScanner users
> on RH/FC/CentOS?
>
> Alex Neuman van der Hans wrote:
> > How much of an improvement? Can you describe both the test and the
> > manual perl compile process and put it up on the wiki?
>
> Do you really want to be encouraging people to compile their own
> binaries of such a critical package?  I wouldn't.
>
> I would advise people to contact their vendor and obtain the hot-fix or
> latest *supported* package.  Of course, if you wanted support, you
> wouldn't be running Fedora.. :-)  So cest la vie.
>
> --
> Kind Regards,           ::   http://www.cjbuckley.net/
> Chris Buckley           ::   http://photos.cjbuckley.net/
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!