Upgrade Issues

Hugo van der Kooij hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Fri Aug 22 20:32:53 IST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Julian Field wrote:
> 
> 
> Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Christo Bezuidenhout wrote:
>>  
>>> We currently use MailScanner 4.65.3 We never needed to upgrade to later
>>> versions. I see some nice features in the latest versions that we can
>>> use. What would be the issues that I need to look out for when upgrading
>>> to the latest version. We also use Clam 0.90.2. This I will also have to
>>> update with SA.
>>>     
>>
>> You need more perl modules. To the best of my knowledge you will need to
>> add at least:  perl-OLE-Storage_Lite
>>   
> Just run the ./install.sh installation script in the new version and it
> will update and install any additional new dependencies. Don't bother
> trying to update them all yourself.

Well. Unfortunaly I am bothering myself to do just that. But it is part
of the wrapper package so it shouldn't bother yum users either.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIrxRiBvzDRVjxmYERAjNkAJ0bjjkhwo/05GnnDcYfyy9+W5qA+gCfcW9g
14M234A+4NvESPiFzShUcOw=
=uB9B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the MailScanner mailing list