Upgrade Issues
Hugo van der Kooij
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Fri Aug 22 20:32:53 IST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Julian Field wrote:
>
>
> Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Christo Bezuidenhout wrote:
>>
>>> We currently use MailScanner 4.65.3 We never needed to upgrade to later
>>> versions. I see some nice features in the latest versions that we can
>>> use. What would be the issues that I need to look out for when upgrading
>>> to the latest version. We also use Clam 0.90.2. This I will also have to
>>> update with SA.
>>>
>>
>> You need more perl modules. To the best of my knowledge you will need to
>> add at least: perl-OLE-Storage_Lite
>>
> Just run the ./install.sh installation script in the new version and it
> will update and install any additional new dependencies. Don't bother
> trying to update them all yourself.
Well. Unfortunaly I am bothering myself to do just that. But it is part
of the wrapper package so it shouldn't bother yum users either.
Hugo.
- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIrxRiBvzDRVjxmYERAjNkAJ0bjjkhwo/05GnnDcYfyy9+W5qA+gCfcW9g
14M234A+4NvESPiFzShUcOw=
=uB9B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list