Spam/Ham learning address

[Andrew MacLachlan]

Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:34:18PM +0100, Andrew MacLachlan wrote:
>   
>> Is there any way that MailScanner can force an sa-learn operation on 
>> messages sent to a specific address? i.e. learn as the message passes 
>> through rather than interrogate a mailbox? (I guess it could then file 
>> the message in /dev/nul rather than forward it )
>>     
>
> This has come up before, *somewhere* that I remember seeing it.
>
> The problem is that to do it safely, the mail user agent forwarding the
> message can't actually *forward* it, it has to do something closer to
> what Mutt refers to as a 'bounce' -- and even that may not preserve
> enough headers to do the job properly.
>
>   
Hmmm... just as I suspected. Thanks.

--
This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.