Spam/Ham learning address
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at baylink.com
Thu Aug 14 21:50:05 IST 2008
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:34:18PM +0100, Andrew MacLachlan wrote:
> Is there any way that MailScanner can force an sa-learn operation on
> messages sent to a specific address? i.e. learn as the message passes
> through rather than interrogate a mailbox? (I guess it could then file
> the message in /dev/nul rather than forward it )
This has come up before, *somewhere* that I remember seeing it.
The problem is that to do it safely, the mail user agent forwarding the
message can't actually *forward* it, it has to do something closer to
what Mutt refers to as a 'bounce' -- and even that may not preserve
enough headers to do the job properly.
Or do you mean "spamtrap/sneakemail" kinda stuff?
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
-- (Josef Stalin)
More information about the MailScanner