Anjelina Jolie XXX Video Free.

ram ram at
Mon Aug 4 06:55:00 IST 2008

On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 13:01 +0200, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Glenn Steen wrote:
> | 2008/7/30 Jay R. Ashworth <jra at>:
> |> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 02:09:50PM +0800, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> |>>    Funny. Person responsible for this really truly is my hero.
> |>>
> |>>
> |>>    I smell a troll.
> |> This spam leaked through this week on mythtv-users at as well.
> |>
> |> Cheers,
> |> -- jra
> | I'm not sure "leaked" is the correctterm here, since ... to my
> | knowlege... the ML isn't checked for spam. This is due to the fact
> | that any number of posts could (and do) contain snippets, or whole
> | messages) of spam... As examples...
> | And the discussion itself could trigger a few rules:-).
> | I've always been surprised at the very low amount of spam getting
> | "reflected" through the list...:-)
> I guess the fact that only subscribers can post means most of the real
> spam is shot down as non-list traffic.
> In my view any mailinglist not using a "subscribers only" policy will be
> shot to pieces. Something I have seen happen a few times in the past few
> years.

Sorry but how does a subscriber only policy still work.

 Cant a spammer trivially forge any random registered users id and send
spam. I have been always wondering how list owners keep spam out when
there is such a big danger

More information about the MailScanner mailing list