[OT] Andrew Chester is out of the office.
peter at farrows.org
Mon Apr 28 14:12:59 IST 2008
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
> Dan Hollis <spamtrap71892316634 at anime.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Ronny T. Lampert wrote:
>>>> The oof deserves a forced unsubscription from the list, but the
>>>> unenforceable legalese raises that to a permanent ban level imo.
>>>> Allowing such nondisclosure statements on the list is too legally
>>>> risky and should be totally blocked.
>>> Not all of us have a choice; the are mailservers out the
>>> automatically appending such nonsense; there are bosses out there
>>> REQUIRING you to have that nonsense.
>>> What should the poor guy do?
>> he should not be using a company account for the maillist. if your
>> company is so paranoid about such things then they should not be
>> using their accounts for public mailing lists. simple as that.
>> most other lists ban such nonsense.
> I had not thought of that myself. I wonder is his employer knows about
> his extra curricular activities.
Being so perfect must consume vast amounts of your time.
So what, the guy sent an out of office reply to a mailing list, the
moderator should remove him temporarily from the list and everyone else
should move on.
Its no big deal, there is nothing to see here, move on...its like being
witness to a bunch of old dears and the launderette gossiping about a
neighbour, I didn't realise we had so many curtain twitchers on the list.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Inexcom system Scanner,
and is believed to be clean.
Advanced heuristic mail scanning server [-].
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MailScanner