SMTP-AUTH mail being marked as spam
Julian Field
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sun Apr 27 18:30:27 IST 2008
Gerard wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:14:53 +0100
> Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>> Valmiki N. Ramsewak wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I run the latest version of mailscanner and postfix 2.3.6.
>>> I send mail from my laptop, via the mail server. I have SMTP-AUTH
>>> enabled so only credentialed users can send. However any mail sent
>>> this way is being marked as spam. This happened to me before and I
>>> realized the problem was I wasn't having postfix add the
>>> (authenticted user = xyz) line in the mail headers, so I included
>>> that and it worked. Now I'm not sure what the problem is.
>>>
>>> If I login to my my mail server and send mail from mutt it
>>> works just fine and doesn't mark it as spam.
>>>
>>> I do want mailscanner to scan the mail, just not mark authenticated
>>> mail as spam, but check for viruses.
>>>
>>> The spamassassin score is -ve.. but it says its being marked as spam
>>> because of spamhaus-ZEN. Granted I'm on a DSL connection with
>>> dynamic ip, so I have no control over what my ip address is when I
>>> reconnect.
>>>
>> You can't use a blacklist that includes dial-up dynamic addresses on
>> your server, connect from a dial-up dynamic address, and not expect
>> to get blacklisted. Simple logic :-)
>>
>> Can you move your blacklist checking into your MTA and have Postfix
>> not apply blacklist checks to authenticated SMTP connections?
>>
>> By the time MailScanner gets at it, it doesn't know whether you were
>> authenticated or not (but you could write a simple Custom Function to
>> set the "Spam List" setting to different values depending on the
>> first header in the message, and look for the signs that your mail
>> server thinks you are authenticated).
>>
>> Jules
>>
>
> Are you the only user on the system? If so, just send via port 587. Do
> not allow Mailscanner to touch that port. You will still receive mail
> via port 25, which is scanned by Mailscanner. It is fairly trivial to
> set that up on a Postfix system.
>
If you do that, you won't get any virus scanning either, which is rather
a dangerous thing to do.
Jules
--
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
PGP public key: http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list