watermark error?

[Mark Nienberg]

Mikael Syska wrote:
> Well ... maybe I see kind a the same ... dont know ... still in
> testing phase here ...
>
> But does it log bad(you mean invalid ?)  watermarks ... I havent seen
> any options to toggle it yet ?
>   
An example from the maillog:

Apr 24 16:43:09 tesla sendmail[13227]: m3ONh4nm013227: from=<>, 
size=116484, class=0,
nrcpts=1, msgid=<81b350d6-6a83-4301-ac5a-6c93fa7af7a0>, proto=ESMTP, 
daemon=MTA,
relay=server83.appriver.com [72.32.68.79]

Apr 24 16:43:10 tesla MailScanner[12395]: New Batch: Scanning 1 
messages, 116966 bytes
Apr 24 16:43:10 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Spam Checks: Starting

Apr 24 16:43:10 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Message m3ONh4nm013227 had bad 
watermark,
added 1 to spam score

Apr 24 16:43:13 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Message m3ONh4nm013227 from 
72.32.68.79 ()
to tippingmar.com is not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=1.204, 
required 5.5,
BAYES_00 -0.50, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, INVALID_MSGID 1.90, 
MIME_BOUND_MANY_HEX 0.80,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -1.00)

Apr 24 16:43:13 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Spam Checks completed at 47384 
bytes per second
Apr 24 16:43:13 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Virus and Content Scanning: 
Starting
Apr 24 16:43:16 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Filename Checks: Allowing 
m3ONh4nm013227 07115In
voice6751.pdf (no rule matched)
Apr 24 16:43:16 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Filename Checks: Allowing 
m3ONh4nm013227 msg-123
95-29.html (no rule matched)
Apr 24 16:43:16 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Filename Checks: Allowing 
m3ONh4nm013227 msg-123
95-28.msg (no rule matched)
Apr 24 16:43:16 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Filename Checks: Allowing 
m3ONh4nm013227 msg-123
95-27.html (no rule matched)
Apr 24 16:43:16 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Filename Checks: Allowing 
m3ONh4nm013227 msg-123
95-26.txt

Apr 24 16:43:16 tesla MailScanner[12395]: Uninfected: Delivered 1 messages

Apr 24 16:43:16 tesla sendmail[13237]: m3ONh4nm013227: to=noyes, 
delay=00:00:09,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local, pri=236484, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent

Mark