problems with dkim-milter and mailscanner/postfix

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul Hutchings wrote:
| I suppose it's a conversation for a different list so hope I'm not going
| too OT here, but without getting into the wars about standard X vs
| standard Y, is it actually worth the effort of getting DKIM working in
| peoples opinions?
|
| We use SPF and obviously it doesn't stop spam but it does stop spoofing.
|
| DKIM/DomainKeys seems to make me a "good net citizen" but at present my
| understanding is all it really does is authenticates?

One of the main DKIM players is yahoo. Another is google. I happen to
get a lot of spam with valid DKIM stuff from Yahoo. Others are not keen
on Google. So it seems to me DKIM is not adding anything except a large
header block to each message.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIDsGLBvzDRVjxmYERAmnSAJ4xN0Qxx6IDPiHJCareJUVL8vsWEwCgiZJb
NXfRtZcMuoHfUsh+JJFmJCA=
=ZaKH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----