Request: Disable update.bad.phishing.sites job when phishing
checks are disabled
Julian Field
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Thu Apr 10 16:16:17 IST 2008
Randal, Phil wrote:
> Jules wrote:
>
>
>> If they were changed to only update if, for example, "Spam Assassin =
>>
> yes" was set, it would
>
>> have to be checked a lot more frequently as otherwise your
>>
> SpamAssassin would be horribly out
>
>> of date for the first day you tried to use it, which
>> a) would create a really bad impression of its abilities just when you
>>
> need it to work
>
>> properly as you are setting it up,
>> and
>> b) would cause a lot more overhead on your server as these cronjobs
>>
> would need to run at
>
>> least every hour, instead of once every day.
>>
>
> Jules,
>
> There's a plan to not bundle ANY rules with SA 3.3.0, so an sa-update on
> install we become mandatory.
>
Do you know if the "make install" phase of building it will do that? Or
are they hoping that everyone installing it will read all the docs and
hence know how to do that.
Jules
--
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list