SA times out
dave.list at pixelhammer.com
Fri Apr 4 20:14:23 IST 2008
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Julian Field wrote on Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:45:54 +0100:
>>>> but perhaps a feature request could be a
>>>> CLI switch to specify the message ID so MS only scans the particular
>>>> message(s) that you're interested in observing.
>>> Good idea. I'll take a look. Would a single ID do?
>> All done. It will be in the next release.
> Ahm, Julian, now that I have used the MS debugging feature a few times I
> think being able to grab a single ID may be nice, but not really helpful
> for a production machine. I have to disable at least MS if I want to debug
> (otherwise it would "steal" the queue files) and usually this is not done
> within a few seconds, but takes at least five minutes or more, maybe
> repeatedly. It would be nice if I could specify an alternative queue
> directory, so I can run a MailScanner instance in parallel to the
> production daemon and debug files from that directory while the normal
> sendmail/MS operation isn't affected. I think this would be much more
> helpful than specifying a certain ID.
I second the proposal, having used the debug feature several times in
the last few days that would be a most excellent addition.
In 50 years, our descendants will look back on the early years
of the internet, and much like we now look back on men with
rockets on their back and feathers glued to their arms, marvel
that we had the intelligence to wipe the drool from our chins.
More information about the MailScanner