Watermarking rehashed

[Julian Field]

Mike Masse wrote:
> I've been bitten by the problem of Watermarking and OoO replies 
> tripping  the automatic spam designation.     I like the idea of it 
> and would reather not have to just turn it off.   Is there any way to 
> have the watermarking code just add spam points as opposed to 
> automatically declaring a spam?
I'll definitely take a look at doing that.
>     Also, maybe I'm misunderstanding how watermarking works, but would 
> it be possible to add a check in addition to the return path, in that 
> the from: address gets looked at as well, and if the return path = 
> null then it's a DSN, but if the from: address is not our domain, then 
> it's not automatically backscatter?
I'm having a bit of a brain go-slow at the moment. Can you give me an 
example or two of what you mean?

>
> Mike
>
>

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk